But given that the lab leak (deliberate or accidental) came from Wuhan, and given the Chinese cover up and given the Fauci denials exposed by Senator Rand Paul, and given the NIH, NIAID cover ups and the US Intelligence services cover up, when their 3 month long report into the origin of Covid-19 ordered by presidential impersonator Biden yielded nothing, and given the relationships between the NIAID, the NIH, the WIV, the EcoHealth Alliance, the University of North Carolina and Moderna, I cannot see any room for anyone else.
这篇最搞笑的不是这消息还是二手屎吗 怒转每日邮报拆腻子只配吃n手shit
It has also been noted for its unreliability and widely criticised for its printing of sensationalist and inaccurate scare stories of science and medical research,[17][18][19][20] and for instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement.[21][22][23][24] In February 2017, the Daily Mail became the first source to be deprecated as an "unreliable source" for use as a reference on the English Wikipedia.[25][26]
它还因其不可靠而受到关注,并因其印刷耸人听闻和不准确的科学和医学研究的恐怖故事而受到广泛批评,[17][18][19][20] 以及剽窃和侵犯版权的例子。 [21] [22][23][24] 2017 年 2 月,《每日邮报》成为第一个被弃用为“不可靠来源”的来源,用作英文维基百科的参考。